Cyber Insurance Technical Evidence Review

Your carrier wants evidence, not assurances.

Independent reviews of available technical evidence to support insurance questionnaire discussions. Fixed fee. No surprises.

// Illustrative Evidence Review
MFA Coverage — All Users 38%
Backup Immutability Verified 55%
Privileged Access Controls 62%
Vulnerability Patch SLA 41%
Logging & SIEM Coverage 78%
Evidence Status Summary
NEEDS REMEDIATION
↳ Evidence gap identified — supporting documentation may be needed for renewal or questionnaire discussions.
Technical Evidence Review
Texas-Based — Conroe, TX
Independent Technical Evidence Review
Discussion-Ready Deliverables
Independent — Not Your MSP
// The Problem

Evidence requests require organized support.
Operational reporting may not be organized around insurance evidence requests.

Carriers Increasingly Ask for Verifiable Evidence

Underwriters increasingly ask for proof of controls such as MFA, backups, endpoint protection, and incident response readiness. Self-attestation may not be enough if the answers cannot be supported later with screenshots, exports, or configuration evidence.

Evidence Gaps Can Complicate Insurance Discussions

If controls were described inaccurately or cannot be proven later, the claim process may become more difficult. The goal is to identify evidence gaps before renewal or incident review.

Independent Second Set of Eyes

Your MSP may be doing good operational work, but insurance evidence requires a separate review lens. We help organize proof, identify gaps, and give owners, brokers, and IT teams a clearer picture before renewal.

Coverage Reviews Can Become Harder Without Evidence

Without documented controls, renewal and questionnaire discussions may involve additional questions or evidence requests. The goal is to understand evidence gaps before the renewal process becomes urgent.

Many SMBs assume their IT is "covered." In practice, at least one insurance control is often only partially implemented — especially MFA, backup recovery, privileged access, endpoint coverage, or incident response documentation.

// Our Solution

Technical Evidence Review — organized for insurance questionnaire discussions.

We produce a structured technical evidence package that maps your controls to common cyber insurance questionnaire categories — so owners, brokers, and IT teams can understand what is supportable before renewal or vendor review.

Independent Remote Technical Evidence Review

Conducted remotely in 2–5 business days. No on-site disruption to your team or MSP relationship.

47-Point Evidence Checklist

Mapped to carrier questionnaire categories: MFA, backups, patch management, access control, logging.

Broker and Underwriter Discussion-Ready Report

Executive summary, Evidence Coverage Summary — Internal Review Metric, findings by severity, and appendix of reviewed evidence — formatted for renewal conversations. This is not an insurer score.

Remediation Roadmap

Prioritized action items so your team or MSP knows exactly what to address before renewal.

$3K–$7K
Fixed fee — scoped to your environment
  • Free 30-minute scope & discovery call
  • Remote technical evidence review (2–5 business days)
  • 47-item evidence checklist, completed
  • Executive summary report (questionnaire-oriented language)
  • Evidence Coverage Summary — Internal Review Metric (not an insurer score)
  • Remediation priority matrix
  • One revision pass after evidence questions
  • Available for multi-vendor environments
Schedule Discovery Call
Fixed scope and written quote before engagement. Payment terms defined in the Statement of Work.
// Process

Three steps to organized evidence.

01

Free 30-Min Scope Call

We review your current environment, questionnaire context, and upcoming renewal timeline. You get a fixed quote — no obligation.

No cost 30 minutes Remote
02

Remote Technical Evidence Review (2–5 Days)

We conduct a structured technical evidence review using read-only access, screenshot evidence, and your existing documentation. No agent installs. No disruption.

Azure / Mixed Read-only 2–5 days
03

Broker and Underwriter Discussion-Ready Report

You receive a structured technical evidence package — with an Evidence Coverage Summary, findings, and a remediation roadmap your MSP can use to plan next steps.

PDF + Appendix Evidence language 1 revision
// Sample Deliverables

A practical evidence package for broker and underwriter conversations.

47-Item Evidence Checklist

Completed, timestamped checklist covering MFA, backups, patch management, access control, logging, and insurance-specific controls.

PDF + Interactive

Executive Evidence Review Report

Broker and underwriter discussion-ready executive summary with an Evidence Coverage Summary — Internal Review Metric, findings by severity, and category-level evidence status. It is not an insurer score.

Discussion-Ready PDF

Pre-Audit Questionnaire

Structured intake form capturing carrier details, environment topology, prior incidents, and compliance obligations.

25 Questions

Remediation Roadmap

Prioritized action plan mapping each gap to a specific fix, owner (IT/MSP), and estimated effort — organized by evidence gap priority and remediation effort.

Actionable

Evidence Appendix

Screenshots, configuration exports, and policy documents — organized by control category with examiner notes.

Evidence Record

One Revision Pass

After carrier review, we address any additional questions or evidence requests — at no additional charge.

Included
// FAQ

Common questions.

This service is a technical evidence review, not a formal audit, compliance certification, underwriting assessment, insurance advice, or legal advice. It is not a penetration test. The goal is to help the business understand which cyber insurance answers are technically supportable with available evidence. Any certification, attestation, assessor type, or supporting-document expectation should be confirmed directly with the broker or carrier.
Yes. Most SMBs run mixed environments and that's exactly what we review. The pre-audit questionnaire captures your full vendor topology. We've worked across Azure AD/Entra ID, AWS IAM, Fortinet firewalls, on-prem Active Directory, and third-party SaaS. The evidence checklist is vendor-agnostic — mapped to control categories, not specific platforms.
The technical evidence review is not a performance review of your IT team. We work alongside your existing MSP and use read-only access. The report is framed as an evidence artifact, not a critique.
The remediation roadmap helps you and your MSP organize evidence gaps and potential next steps. Whether an insurer accepts any mitigation plan, alternative evidence, or compensating control is determined by the broker and carrier.
Most MSP reports are operational. This review is evidence-focused: it organizes screenshots, exports, configuration proof, gaps, and remediation priorities around common cyber insurance questionnaire categories. We can work alongside your MSP so the business, broker, and IT team all have a clearer view of what is technically supportable.
In 30 minutes we cover: your carrier and renewal date, your current environment (vendors, headcount, cloud vs. on-prem ratio), any known gaps or prior carrier feedback, and your timeline. From that, we scope the engagement and provide a fixed fee. No sales pressure — if we're not the right fit, we'll tell you. The call is yours regardless of next steps.
// Get Started

Start with a free 30-minute discovery call.

Tell us about your environment and upcoming renewal. We'll scope the engagement and give you a fixed quote — no commitment required.

Do not submit passwords, access credentials, policy documents, screenshots, incident details, or other sensitive client information through this form.

By submitting this request, you agree that Cyber Audit Pro may use the information you provide to respond to your inquiry. See our Privacy page for details.

Prefer email instead? Contact audit@kerget.com.